A View From the Cheap Seats

September 24, 2009

Racism – Is That The Best You Got?

Filed under: National,Politics — trzupek @ 10:16 am

CARI.CarterEXAMINER PUBLICATIONS – SEPTEMBER 23, 2009

By Rich Trzupek

Even bad Presidents usually make good elder statesmen, once they move out of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW. Yet, while James Earl Carter was a disaster as a President, and perhaps this should come as no surprise, his subsequent career as an egomaniacal, finger-wagging, appeasing meddler has been equally embarrassing. Applause, applause – by all means – for Carter’s work with Habitat For Humanity. Unfortunately, it’s all been downhill from there.

Last week’s pronouncement that racism was at work among those who oppose President Obama’s health care proposals was classic Carter bluster: righteous noise with little substance. It’s hard to imagine that the man could make himself even more irrelevant, but somehow he continues to find ways to do so.

Are there racists out there? Sure. Are there racists who will oppose anything this President proposes, based on the color of his skin? Yes again. But to imply that racism is the root cause, or even an important part, of the America’s concern about publicly-funded health care is to betray complete ignorance about the way Americans think and, in particular, what Americans think about their government.

This isn’t about the race of the man who made the proposals, this is about the substance of the proposals. Americans, by and large, hate dealing with the agents of government, from the IRS right down to the DMV. We find them inefficient, officious and irritating. While it’s expensive and a pain in the rear dealing with insurance companies, many of us – your humble correspondent included – have no desire to substitute another layer of government-run bureaucracy in their place. And there is absolutely nothing racist about those fears.

But this debate, such as it has been, has revealed a great deal about the left’s hypocrisy and ignorance. Nancy Pelosi wrung her hands and shed crocodile tears over the passion that the health care debate has unleashed. Equating the President to Hitler, and his policies to socialism? Oh dear. Oh dear.

And the comparisons may be a bit of hyperbole, but Madam Speaker seems to be boarding the moderation train a bit after it left the station. I can’t recall her complaining when her followers equated President Bush to the Austrian corporal (how many times did we hear the “Bushitler” line?) and equate his policies to fascism? Payback, as they say, is a canine of the female gender.

In truth, Hitler was a socialist when it came to domestic policies and he would have applauded socialized health care. There is a reason that the moniker “National Socialist German Workers Party” included the word “socialist”. It was one of the pillars upon which the party’s foundation rested. So calling Hitler to mind when it comes to government run health care may be insulting and over-the-top, but there is certainly a grain of truth at its core.

Such is also the case when one more closely examines Congressman Joe Wilson’s “you lie!” exclamation. The outburst certainly was lacking in decorum (event the raucous British Parliament does not allow members to call each other liars), but it was not lacking in truth.

It is true that Obama’s proposals do not directly make illegal immigrants eligible for publicly-funded healthcare, as the President said. However, those proposals also do not require providers to check the immigration status of patients. In fact, Democrats shot down language that would have required such a check, in committee.

So, while the supposed intent may be to provide publicly-funded healthcare only to citizens and legal immigrants, the effect of this legislation would be quite the opposite. It’s analogous to saying that there is a rule against running in the corridors at school, but not providing any hall monitors to enforce the prohibition. Every parent and teacher knows that, in such a circumstance, kids will be flying down the halls at supersonic speed as soon as they figure out the reality of the situation.

The President’s supporters have spent much of their debating time arguing about such shades of meaning, without enhancing their credibility much. The word “death panel” never appeared in any proposal, but “end of life panel” certainly did (it was subsequently, and quietly, dropped) and Sarah Palin was right to bring the proposal to light. Moreover, the principal of the thing is what mattered. It’s about rationing healthcare and who makes the decisions to ration. No one enjoys dealing with the faceless decision-makers at an HMO who approve or disapprove a particular treatment, but faceless government decision-makers? That is a sobering thought indeed.

The President himself has frequently stretched the truth during this debate. A case in point is his claim that an Illinois man, Otto Raddatz, died after being denied treatment by his insurance company. “They delayed his treatment, and he died because of it,” the President said.

Turns out that wasn’t the case. Raddatz ended up getting the treatment, and lived another four years because of it. This revelation prompted the incomparable Mark Steyn to drily observe that the old Dem slogan “Bush lied – people died” might be replaced by “Obama lied – nobody died” in 2009.

That is not to say that one could not find an example of a patient being denied treatment by an insurance company and subsequently dying. Those examples exist, just as similar examples exist in places like Canada and the United Kingdom, where bureaucrats make those life or death calls.

No system created by and administered by fallible human beings will ever be mistake free. That Americans would prefer the failings of the market over the failings of big government is not a case of racism. The correct word would be “prudence”.

Advertisements

1 Comment »

  1. There should be emphasis on E-Verify being adopted by every business in America, mandatory or not? Now that it’s locked into the US workers psyche, it should be evident to the pro-illegal immigrant groups that–THE PEOPLE–are not letting go of this computer illegal immigrant enforcement application without a fight. It has been ridiculed and ostracized by the US Chamber of Commerce and subjected to federal lawsuits by the anti-sovereignty groups as the ACLU. I’m not one for conspiracy theories, but when the Council of Foreign Relation intolerable globalist and internationalists get involved with America’s immigration face-off, you really wonder what their true agenda is? GOOGLE– across the Internet and understand their plan for the free flow of low income labor in every available industry including Agricultural jobs.

    This quasi agency was the machine involved with the inception of NAFTA. Coincidentally, I recall that President Obama and his administration addressed the general public that he would renegotiate the treaties of NAFTA and CAFTA? So far this has not materialized, nor has his promise to implement an open transparent government? He is following the same illusory lines as the Bush presidency, other than National security–remaining secretive?

    E-Verify is a very powerful immigration tool that is a composite of the SAVE ACT. Around the country it’s building in momentum as more and more companies are intending to use it? It could additionally have multiple future uses, including detecting illegal aliens applying for driver’s licenses. It could also be adapted to apprehend any foreign nationals who apply in any health care reform or any other government benefit. By overturning the 1986 Immigration legislation and enacting a new AMNESTY the American population lose culturally and financially. Another possibility is checking the status of individuals admitted to higher education or schools. Its availability is a free service on the web, by accessing both Homeland Security and the Social Security databases. On an ongoing basis it is seemingly the principle tool to detour anybody who is stealing jobs from the legal population.

    It almost succumbed to Democratic leadership, because both Sen Reid and Pelosi had an ulterior motive to kill E-Verify and other immigration enforcement weapons. Having massive illegal immigrant occupation in both Nevada and California and an escalating need to financially support the millions already thriving in all Border States. YOU CAN HELP AMERICAN WORKERS IN THIS JOBLESS SETTINGS AND HALT ANY NEW AMNESTY BY CONTACTING YOUR POLITICIANS AT 202-224-3121. NUMBERSUSA, JUDICIAL WATCH & CAPSWEB have many of the true answers for you to decide.

    Comment by brittanicus — September 24, 2009 @ 7:18 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: