A View From the Cheap Seats

March 19, 2008

Learning Experience

Filed under: Humor,Politics,Streamwood — trzupek @ 9:47 am

THE STREAMWOOD EXAMINER – MARCH 26, 2008

(Note: Due to an uncharacteristic bout of technical incompetence by the author, the column below did not actually appear in the March 19 edition of the mighty Examiner, as originally planned. It will run in the March 26 edition. However, since I have already posted it, we’ll keep it posted, as a “Rich returns from honeymoon bonus preview” for those readers who frequent the electronic version of the Cheap Seats. Cheers, Rich)

By Rich Trzupek

You leave town for a couple of weeks on honeymoon and it’s absolutely amazing how much you can learn when you get back. Having attended virtually every village board meeting over the last eight years, I thought I had a pretty good handle on the way things work in Streamwood. However, it seems that I had much to learn. For example:

•I now know that it’s impossible for residents to contact trustees directly. This revelation surprised me, since Streamwood residents seem to be able to track your humble correspondent down on a pretty regular basis, through any of my three e-mail addresses, four phone numbers or at a local pub. Apparently, however, when one is elected trustee one is hermetically sealed in a mayonnaise jar, which makes contact with the outside world impossible, except through the village website of course.

•I have learned that it is a very bad, evil thing for towns to treat e-mails from residents as official inquiries, not personal notes. It is common, of course, for municipalities to do this and the thinking is: if you e-mail the town, then you want the town’s official response, not the opinion of one board member. (Shoot, if you e-mail Cecille, he’ll pretty much promise you anything you want, up to and including a personal helicopter to beat the morning rush).

But we don’t have to worry about that, because there are many other ways of contacting individual board members, right? Oh wait, I forgot about the mayonnaise jars. See, how much I’m learning?

•I see that one William Morris, Esq. has been transformed into a shining light for good government. I can already picture the statue of Bill Morris, triumphantly raising the torch of liberty, that will soon stand proudly in the middle of town. For this is a new Bill Morris, an improved Bill Morris, a Bill Morris that would never fiddle with his nominating petitions, or lie about fiddling with his nominating petitions, or entrust his campaign to three of the biggest low-lifes in Illinois politics.

And, because he has been born again, we can not say that Bill Morris giving advice on openness and honesty is akin to Paris Hilton explaining the virtues of chastity. We would like to, but we can’t, and I for one, am grateful.

•I have discovered that trustees in our town can never, ever debate issues, or propose ordinances, or (God forbid) cast a negative vote under Streamwood’s current form of government. I was surprised to learn this, because I could swear I remember writing stories over the years where trustees debated plans for new developments, purchasing decisions, intergovernmental agreements, road plans, hiring decisions and a host of other things, but – apparently – these things never happened.

We know that these things never happened, and could never happen (presumably because Billie Roth exercises magical mind control that keeps elected officials from exercising their free will) because Jim Cecille and Jason Speer said it is so. And, when you want to learn about the way government works, these are the guys to turn to.

•And I have found out that it is not fair to question Cecille and Speer’s knowledge, just because – oh for example – Jimmy has, over the past eight years, pretty much set the world record for asking questions for which the answers are sitting right there in front of him, in his packet, and for which staff members routinely bail him out by saying “that’s a good question trustee”, when everyone else is staring at the answer in black and white.

But we’re not going to question their grasp of these important issues, nor would it be relevant to tell Jason that the 70’s called and wants its sport coats back (but really, dude, turn off the jackets already), not only because I actually helped these guys in the last election, when they apparently thought the village was being run well and were actually against the guys who wanted to rip the guts out of our town, but because that other paper agrees with them about this whole “how Streamwood is run” question. You know, the paper that – until very recently – either sent no one to cover the village, or hired the semi-literate to do the job (and “nobody” generally provided better coverage), so you know that they know what they’re talking about.

•Best of all, or at least most amusing of all, I am pleased to learn that trustee Speer is on track to win the John McGuire Memorial Trophy. As veteran readers know, this award was established to honor the former Bartlett Fire District Trustee’s love of ride-alongs. Old John was famous for getting all dressed up and riding with the boys out to fires, even giving commands in some cases.

Well, Jason loves his ride-alongs. Police, fire, public works – doesn’t matter. He can’t get enough. I’m not sure if he gets to ring the bell or play with the sirens, but Jason is all about ride-alongs and gets positively pissy when he’s told he can’t go on more. Oh, I know what you’re thinking. Phrases like “waste of taxpayer’s dollars” and “liability risk” and perhaps even “are you kidding me, is he – like – twelve years old or what?” come to mind. But trust me, there’s a plan here. For, the next time his fire-fighter pals bug Jason to hire more bodies, he’ll just join up himself. See? It’s brilliant.

Ah, it’s good to back folks, and it’s wonderful to have a new perspective. Just imagine how much more we’ll learn together in the months to come.

Advertisements

6 Comments »

  1. Rich,

    Welcome back! I am sorry to hear that since you were gone on your nuptials that you did not know that the village of Streamwood has had a complete catharsis. I mean, Billie has gained magical powers of control over 70% of the village’s voters and Jason and Jimmy have magically become Democrats (well Jason anyways) with a blessing from Jason Hughes and Jim Duhsakis. OMG, can you imagine that the boy that was born on third base and thinks he hit a triple is being told no? Well this simply won’t stand. Nevermind that a super majority made a decision that the village was just fine “Thank you very much”. The 30% of Streamwood voters that know what is best for the village will rise to smite all who disagree. So sayeth the chosen! HUH?

    Comment by John Adams — March 19, 2008 @ 11:16 am | Reply

  2. Hey, John Adams is DEAD or could you be Sam Adams.

    Rich Trzupek you made me laugh and you must have a screw loose. You needed one more week with your honeymoon. Billy and Jason this is one funny article and Cecille the article is right in front of you.

    PS John Adams I attached my real name Ronald Regan.

    Or Rick Brogan

    Comment by Rick Brogan — March 19, 2008 @ 9:37 pm | Reply

  3. I invite you to explore your community and become better acquainted with your police, fire, public works and building departments by obtaining a working knowledge of how your village works. There is nothing wrong with elected officials taking ride alongs and I would encourage eveyone to learn about the day to day opperations of your government.
    The success of any Village is a result of the support from our mayor and village board, involvement of our citizens and the commitment and dedication of our department members.
    This philosophy of of good goverment is based on the concept that elected officials are working together in creative ways can help solve contemporary community problems. It is through this teamwork approach that you would be able to reduce citizens complaints and improve the overall quality of life in our Village.

    Comment by RIck — March 22, 2008 @ 2:22 pm | Reply

  4. Rich, I am requesting that you post or print my reply. Thank you

    I invite you to explore your community and become better acquainted with your police, fire, public works and building departments by obtaining a working knowledge of how your village works. There is nothing wrong with elected officials taking ride alongs and I would encourage eveyone to learn about the day to day opperations of your government.
    The success of any Village is a result of the support from our mayor and village board, involvement of our citizens and the commitment and dedication of our department members.
    This philosophy of good goverment is based on the concept that elected officials are working together in creative ways can help solve contemporary community problems. It is through this teamwork approach that you would be able to reduce citizens complaints and improve the overall quality of life in our Village.

    Comment by Rick Brogan — March 22, 2008 @ 8:40 pm | Reply

  5. Rick B.

    Thanks for the latest comment. I agree with you – there is nothing wrong with elected officials taking ride-alongs. I hope that, as a police officer, you would also agree that there is a limit to the number of ride-alongs that elected officials should reasonably take. For the latter is really the issue I raised – it’s not about ride-alongs per se, it’s about “how many is enough”. I don’t have a problem with a trustee going on a ride-along or two. But I do think it’s a problem when an elected official takes multiple ride-alongs, and then – when somebody finally says “that’s enough” – said official acts as if they have been terribly wronged.

    I have been on a total of one ride-along in my eight years on The Examiner. From my perspective, that was a privilege, not a right. It is akin, I guess, to when I was stack testing (in my misbegotten younger days) and a photographer went on a “climb along” with one of my crews. I didn’t mind it, exactly, but having an extra, untrained body along in what was basically a dangerous job put an extra burden on me. Once in a while? OK. Every day? That would have made me crazy (perhaps “crazier” would be more appropos). I doubt that you would want to be looking out for a visitor while on patrol every day either.

    Now there is some point in between “one time” and “every day” that ride-alongs or climb-alongs become intrusive and needlessly risky to the parties involved. We can, and perhaps should, debate where that point is. But, for me anyway, to have an elected official complain and act petulant because the professionals involved have chosen to draw that line represents a disappointing lack of judgment. I frankly expected more from Jason and I hope that this experience will provide a learning experience for him.

    Comment by trzupek — March 22, 2008 @ 11:52 pm | Reply

  6. I agree with you that the average citizen should probably be allowed only a few ride- alongs but not our decision makers. You can not get a real working knowledge of how things work by one or two ride-along or climb-alongs. The funny thing is there is nothing to hide from the public and Streamwood has a very professional police force.

    Some villages have successful volunteer citizen on patrol programs which allows local residents to act as extra eyes and ears for the police.

    Thanks for the open debate! Have a Happy Easter!

    Comment by Rick Brogan — March 23, 2008 @ 8:44 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: